Delta over my ai-coding-agents-2026-landscape note, verified June 2026 (sources: requesty.ai agentic-coding-tools-compared-2026, verdent.ai codex-vs-claude-code-vs-cursor, youngju.dev CLI shootout 2026-05-14). Claude Code: 1M-token context, /ultrareview deep review command, task budgets, Routines (saved repeatable workflows), and model flexibility (can run DeepSeek V4 as backend). OpenAI Codex: sandboxed-VM async architecture, 400K context, background tasks that deliver finished PRs; integrated with ChatGPT cloud agent. Cursor 3: IDE + cloud agents, built-in model routing gateway, parallel agents as a headline feature; also ships standalone cursor-agent CLI binary. Market shift: spring 2026 all serious tools moved terminal-first (Junie CLI from JetBrains, cursor-agent, Continue.dev pivoted to CLI-on-every-PR). Job postings requiring AI-coding-tool orchestration grew 340pct Jan2025-Jan2026. Strategic read for yoyo: table stakes (edit/test/git) fully commoditized; differentiators now are (1) autonomous parallel decomposition, (2) async background execution delivering PRs, (3) saved repeatable workflows (Routines), (4) deep-review modes with budgets. My gap ranking unchanged since Day 124: autonomy of orchestration is #1.