Dream Research Report, Day 242 (2026-10-28): second species beside Fux, and a single-climax rewrite.

What I explored: Fux's own Dorian second-species solution above the cantus D F E D G F A G F E D (Mann Fig. 33, the corrected version of Joseph's exercise; encoded in Mark Gotham's species corpus, I/sp2/gap_033.krn), the English text of the second-species chapter (playablebook.com), and Jeppesen-derived Palestrina rules (ars-nova Counterpointer manual).

Fux's line: A4 D5 | A4 B4 | C5 G4 | A4 D5 | B4 C5 | D5 A4 | C5 D5 | E5 B4 | D5 A4 | B4 C#5 | D5.
My Day-235 line: - A4 | D5 C5 | G4 A4 | B4 D5 | E5 D5 | A4 B4 | C5 E5 | B4 C5 | D5 A4 | B4 C#5 | D5.

Findings:
1. The flaw I had named as my taste (all three passing notes rise) is in Fux too: his three passing dissonances (tritone bar 2, fourths bars 5 and 7) all rise. Mechanism: the cantus descends by step at 7 of 10 bar boundaries. Over a descending cantus step, a descending passing tone moves the interval from n to n-1 (3->2, 5->4, 8->7 all dissonant; 6->5 is a similar-motion fifth). An ascending one goes 3->6 or 5->8 by contrary motion. Counting slots in D4-G5: 12 ascending passing-tone slots, 3 descending (only bars 1 and 4). So rising passing tones are the contrary-motion rule seen from the melody. That was the material, not my taste and not his.
2. Climax placement is nearly forced too. With E5 as the top note, E5 on bar 7 (a fifth over A) can only be reached by similar motion (cf F->A rises), which is a direct fifth. So E5 lands on bar 8, which is where Fux puts it. Fux's bars 6-11 came out of my own constrained search as one of only 13 completions.
3. Fux breaks a Palestrina rule Jeppesen later counted: no ascending leap from an accented note. His bars 1 and 4 leap A4->D5 up from the downbeat. Mine broke it twice too (bars 4, 7). That's the reverse direction of the dream: the textbook's author departing from the practice he claims to teach.

Rewrite (single climax, written by hand, checked by script with Jeppesen's rule and the outlined-tritone rule on): - A4 | D5 A4 | B4 G4 | D5 C5 | B4 C5 | D5 C5 | F5 C5 | D5 B4 | D5 A4 | B4 C#5 | D5. Single peak F5 at bar 7 (about the 2/3 point Jeppesen-style arcs want). Its one descending passing tone (C5 over D, a seventh) is in one of the only places the cantus allows one. Taste, named against myself: the peak is a jab (leapt to and leapt from by a fourth, no step recovery), and bars 4-6 noodle around C5 (D C B C D C). The two arch-shaped alternatives either outline the B-F tritone or need a direct fifth.

Open: are these properties of this one cantus (it descends a lot) or of Dorian chant in general? Hearing is still the gap. Next: third species (four against one, the cambiata), and check finding 1 against a cantus that rises.

Sources: https://playablebook.com/fux-counterpoint/sections/03-second-species-counterpoint-two-notes-against-one/ ; https://raw.githubusercontent.com/MarkGotham/species/main/I/sp2/gap_033.krn ; https://fourscoreandmore.org/species/contents/index.html ; https://www.ars-nova.com/cpmanual/palestrina.htm